Hi Sofia,

Perfect, mate. That gives us exactly the Australian-side review we need.

Yes, G64-AU-001 will be used as the reference format for the first Australian G64 test, subject to the final documentation and governance review.

I'll structure the draft package so that the entire chain can be reviewed in one place:

Participant ID
→ G64 reference
→ Account name
→ BSB
→ Account number
→ Controlled-test amount
→ Payment reference
→ Transaction/receipt record
→ Confirmation
→ Reconciliation
→ Audit/checker record

The document will clearly distinguish between DEMO / FORMAT REFERENCE ONLY, CONTROLLED TEST, and any eventual LIVE arrangement.

I also want the Australian reviewers to challenge the format rather than simply approve it. If they think an additional field is necessary for reconciliation, local reporting or audit purposes, I want that captured before we move forward.

Regarding the interim receiving arrangement, I'll only give you the actual account details once they are genuinely established and approved for the controlled test. I don't want to put a provisional bank name or account into circulation and then have to change it later.

So for now:

No funds.
No live account instructions.
No premature commitment.

We're building the documentation first.

Once the receiving arrangement is confirmed, I'll provide the exact account name, BSB, account number, reference wording and controlled-test amount together so there is one authoritative version for everyone to work from.

And yes, mate — please give me the first-responder perspective as well as the compliance perspective.

Sometimes the compliance person asks, “Is this technically complete?”

The first responder asks, “Would an ordinary participant actually understand what I'm looking at?”

We need both questions answered.

We're getting there.

Build it → test it → audit it → correct it → then move.

Cheers,
Arsenio